PMI Risk Management Professional Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $4.99 payment

Study for the PMI Risk Management Professional Exam. Explore flashcards and multiple choice questions, each with detailed hints and explanations. Prepare to excel on your exam!

Practice this question and more.


What change might reflect a management shift from risk-averse to risk-seeking in a probability and impact matrix?

  1. A higher risk rating is needed before a threat is avoided, transferred, or mitigated.

  2. The very high category for impact will have a higher percentage assigned to it.

  3. The very high category for probability will have a lower percentage assigned to it.

  4. A lower risk rating is needed before an opportunity is avoided, transferred, or mitigated.

The correct answer is: A higher risk rating is needed before a threat is avoided, transferred, or mitigated.

The correct answer indicates that a higher risk rating is necessary before a threat is avoided, transferred, or mitigated, which illustrates a shift from a risk-averse to a risk-seeking management approach. In a risk-averse mindset, organizations typically strive to minimize risks, opting for protective measures even for lower risk ratings. This is reflected in a tendency to act on threats at a lower risk threshold. In contrast, a risk-seeking management approach demonstrates a greater willingness to accept risks and potential negative impacts before taking actions such as avoidance, transfer, or mitigation. By requiring a higher risk rating to trigger these protective actions, management signals a readiness to pursue opportunities, even if they accompany certain risks. This change suggests a willingness to engage with riskier situations, which may reflect a strategy aimed at achieving potentially greater rewards and fostering innovation. The other choices either do not illustrate a clear transition to a risk-seeking approach or reflect an increased caution rather than a shift in mindset. For instance, adjusting impact or probability categories does not inherently indicate a shift in attitude toward risk; rather, it may just indicate different criteria for assessing risk rather than a fundamental change in how risks are approached.